WebGLC v Cleveland Bridge & Engineering Date (1984) Citation 34 BLR 50 Keywords Construction claim - time for completion - implied term - proceed with expedition - … WebTerms in this set (15) year. 1984. what topic does it relate to. contract law and duty of care concerning agreement. what is a letter of intent. this creates no binding contract. only …
THE LEGAL STATUS OF CONSTRUCTION WORK …
WebThe decision was based on strict application and construction of a contract provision that contract administrators shall make ‘fair and reasonable’ assessment of ‘relevant events’ in the contract, a decision consistent with one made in Balfour Beatty v Chestermount.14 In Balfour Beatty it was held that an EOT should be assessed on a ‘net’ rather … hall and sons well drilling vancouver
British Steel Corp v Cleveland Bridge and Engineering Co …
WebFeb 17, 2012 · GLC v Cleveland Bridge and Engineering [1984] 34 BLR 50 Great Atlantic Insurance Co v Home Insurance Co [1981] 1 WLR 529 Leander Construction Ltd v Mulalley and Company Ltd [2011] EWHC 3449 (TCC) Pantelli Associates Ltd v Corporate City Developments Number Two Ltd [2010] EWHC 3189 (TCC) Previous Holiday Pay: Use it … WebGLC v Cleveland Bridge and Engineering (1984) 34 BLR 50 the court noted that these terms meant nothing more than, effectively, “get on with it”. In West Faulkner Associates v London Borough of Newham (1994) 71 BLR 1 the court provided a … WebIn GLC v Cleveland Bridge and Engineering [1984], the court noted that these terms meant nothing more than, effectively, “get on with it”, because it was difficult to see how any specified obligation could be spelt out. 4. In West Faulkner Associates v London Borough of Newham [1994], the court provided more guidance as follows: 2 hall and soskice 2001